parents are suffering at the hands of the courts/social services/cafcass regards 'emotional harm'. this particular part of the child act in our opinion is unjustifiably unfair and reactionary to the baby peter case.
it is a breach of familys human rights under article 8 right to a family life.
worst of all is 'risk of significant harm in the future' this is a type of crystal ball judgement used by judges whom can not justify their actions on the basis of the evidence currently before them.
more to come
No comments:
Post a Comment