Andrea Rowbottom continues her campaign against us
more to come
re : Bullshit report by anonimous neighbour!! on a day we werent even in!!
Saturday 30 April 2011
WON MY APPEAL !!! BAD LUCK DEVON AD CORNWALL POLICE
Police officer harassment conviction overturned
Nigel Baggaley was found guilty of waging an 18-month harassment campaign against Det Sgt Steve Blair by magistrates in Torquay in 2009.
But he always denied knowing his actions had caused DS Blair distress and a judge at Exeter Crown Court yesterday overturned the conviction on appeal.
Recorder Nicholas Hall, sitting with two justices, said although DS Blair had suffered as a result of Baggaley making complaints about him the defendant had not set out to do so.
He said: "In our judgement we are far from convinced that the defendant knew his conduct was causing distress to DS Blair."
The original conviction was based on alleged harassment of DS Blair between July 2007 and October 2008.
The court was told Baggaley had made four complaints about the experienced officer who at the time was serving with Torquay's child abuse investigation section.
Among the complaints was that DS Blair had failed to investigate an alleged offence and illegally disclosed information to a social worker.
It was said Baggaley 'bombarded' DS Blair with phone calls and repeated complaints causing him to take time off work and feel undermined in his job.
This was despite the complaints being rejected by the policing authorities.
Recorder Hall said: "The personal insults and other material in the complaints was beyond what DS Blair might reasonably be expected to have endured
"He did suffer distress as a result of that course of conduct."
But Recorder Hall said the question for the court was whether the defendant knew his actions were alarming.
The defendant said he had never in fact met the police officer and had 'no idea' his complaints were causing distress.
Recorder Hall agreed saying the repeated complaints were in 'far from subtle terms different' from each other and involved other officers as well.
He said every public person had the right to complain and have the complaints considered on their individual merits.
The defendant felt he had not had his original complaint dealt with and so complained again with a different focus.
In reaching his verdict on the appeal Recorder Hall made it clear DS Blair had not breached any professional standards.
He added: "We are not satisfied the Crown have shown he knew or ought to have known by complaining about DS Blair he would cause him alarm or distress.
"The appeal against the conviction is allowed."
But he always denied knowing his actions had caused DS Blair distress and a judge at Exeter Crown Court yesterday overturned the conviction on appeal.
Recorder Nicholas Hall, sitting with two justices, said although DS Blair had suffered as a result of Baggaley making complaints about him the defendant had not set out to do so.
The original conviction was based on alleged harassment of DS Blair between July 2007 and October 2008.
The court was told Baggaley had made four complaints about the experienced officer who at the time was serving with Torquay's child abuse investigation section.
Among the complaints was that DS Blair had failed to investigate an alleged offence and illegally disclosed information to a social worker.
It was said Baggaley 'bombarded' DS Blair with phone calls and repeated complaints causing him to take time off work and feel undermined in his job.
This was despite the complaints being rejected by the policing authorities.
Recorder Hall said: "The personal insults and other material in the complaints was beyond what DS Blair might reasonably be expected to have endured
"He did suffer distress as a result of that course of conduct."
But Recorder Hall said the question for the court was whether the defendant knew his actions were alarming.
The defendant said he had never in fact met the police officer and had 'no idea' his complaints were causing distress.
Recorder Hall agreed saying the repeated complaints were in 'far from subtle terms different' from each other and involved other officers as well.
He said every public person had the right to complain and have the complaints considered on their individual merits.
The defendant felt he had not had his original complaint dealt with and so complained again with a different focus.
In reaching his verdict on the appeal Recorder Hall made it clear DS Blair had not breached any professional standards.
He added: "We are not satisfied the Crown have shown he knew or ought to have known by complaining about DS Blair he would cause him alarm or distress.
"The appeal against the conviction is allowed."
Wednesday 20 April 2011
the SCUM that is leicestershire social services lies lies lies
It seems Leicestershire social services, Andrea Rowbottom, Rachael Sutton and a complete woofter (in my opinion) just can not help themeselves when it come to bullshitting.
they walked into court and made sure we lost our 11 yr old by basically saying anything as long as it was untrue.
after 2 section 7 reports, 1 section 47 report, a section 37 report and 2 addendum reports to that section 37 the liars went from,, "the baggaleys present no risk whatseoever, the child is not at harm of risk now or in the future, there is no evidence of significant harm now or likelyhood of it in the future" to "the baggaleys are now deemed to be a risk" a complete turn around in a 3 WEEK PERIOD! why you may ask? what on earth did we do to wreck 8 months of good reports? why would they turn against us in such a nature?
well, believe it or not it is due to me asking a social worker to leave my home, because i felt he was being over intrusive and acting inapropriately. he refused to go. in the end i asked him in total 16 times to leave and took 2 - 5 minute breaks to cool down in between his refusals to leave, in the end i ushered him out of my home. That was it guys, they turned real nasty over night. All of a sudden it was "oh it is obvious you are not prepared to work with us etc!! we werent saying it .. they were! telling us what we want!
that was 5 weeks ago, since then they have stopped all contact between us and the child, they have succesfully moved him out of leicestershire to devon against his will, (they had to admit in court the child would rather have stayed in foster care rather than live with his drunken grandparents!) and the child is as you can imagine heartbroken.
Andrea Rowbottom has since dropped herself in it by making up stories about the childs school saying we would not leave the playground when asked, this is a total fabrication and the school have stated so. there are lots and lots of lies i could go on all day.
we wont give up, we will never give up. They made a big mistake picking on us.
they walked into court and made sure we lost our 11 yr old by basically saying anything as long as it was untrue.
after 2 section 7 reports, 1 section 47 report, a section 37 report and 2 addendum reports to that section 37 the liars went from,, "the baggaleys present no risk whatseoever, the child is not at harm of risk now or in the future, there is no evidence of significant harm now or likelyhood of it in the future" to "the baggaleys are now deemed to be a risk" a complete turn around in a 3 WEEK PERIOD! why you may ask? what on earth did we do to wreck 8 months of good reports? why would they turn against us in such a nature?
well, believe it or not it is due to me asking a social worker to leave my home, because i felt he was being over intrusive and acting inapropriately. he refused to go. in the end i asked him in total 16 times to leave and took 2 - 5 minute breaks to cool down in between his refusals to leave, in the end i ushered him out of my home. That was it guys, they turned real nasty over night. All of a sudden it was "oh it is obvious you are not prepared to work with us etc!! we werent saying it .. they were! telling us what we want!
that was 5 weeks ago, since then they have stopped all contact between us and the child, they have succesfully moved him out of leicestershire to devon against his will, (they had to admit in court the child would rather have stayed in foster care rather than live with his drunken grandparents!) and the child is as you can imagine heartbroken.
Andrea Rowbottom has since dropped herself in it by making up stories about the childs school saying we would not leave the playground when asked, this is a total fabrication and the school have stated so. there are lots and lots of lies i could go on all day.
we wont give up, we will never give up. They made a big mistake picking on us.
Sunday 3 April 2011
update
since our last blog we have been through costant assessments. leicestershire social services Racheal Sutton and Andrea Rowbottom completed section 37 reports and a section 47 report on our younger children who are not even involved in our family case.
these poeple made it clear to the judge HHJ TYZACK in the first section 37 report that we posed no risk what so ever tto the child. (our lad has now been in interim care for over 4 months) the judge was not happy with the report and order a addendum report, therefore the ss provided a further 29 pages (in their words to prevent the court from saying they havent provided enough information) again although they made it abundantly clear they found no evidence of us being any kind of risk to the child the judge again wasnt happy. so he ordered another addendum report,
this time because we have already answered the questions posed in full and have nothing further to add we made it clear to the ss that we would not answer any further questions, but would agree to continue to work with them re the childs educational needs, which was the original agreement.
they didnt take it very well, they automatically started making threats that if we didnt answer the questions they would say we havent complied with them. within a week we found out they have decided on a complete uturn and now say we are a risk to the child, based on the way in which i have spoken to the social workers on the phone.
now we hear they are recommending the child be placed with his grand parents in torquay, 180 miles away from us, his school and freinds. the social workers have severely shit on us and have now resorted to lying about us.
talk about power crazed
we are in court on 6th april, we expect nothing from the judge who despises us simply because we fight tooth hammer and claw, plus we have accused him of being naiive and inadequate. which he is.
over the weekend the childs grandparent turned up at his foster placement unanounced and tried to tempt him to leave with him ... the grandparent lives in devon,,, he told the child he had been passing by on his way to swindon ( take a look at the route to swindon from torquay) and he thought he would pop in for a cup of tea. (loughborough).. very strange route, anyway the child refused to go. obviously this was a ploy to remove him from leicestershire, if he had gone he would not have come back that is for sure. well done to our lad for not falling for the bullshit being fed to him. this aint over we have only just started the real war!!
these poeple made it clear to the judge HHJ TYZACK in the first section 37 report that we posed no risk what so ever tto the child. (our lad has now been in interim care for over 4 months) the judge was not happy with the report and order a addendum report, therefore the ss provided a further 29 pages (in their words to prevent the court from saying they havent provided enough information) again although they made it abundantly clear they found no evidence of us being any kind of risk to the child the judge again wasnt happy. so he ordered another addendum report,
this time because we have already answered the questions posed in full and have nothing further to add we made it clear to the ss that we would not answer any further questions, but would agree to continue to work with them re the childs educational needs, which was the original agreement.
they didnt take it very well, they automatically started making threats that if we didnt answer the questions they would say we havent complied with them. within a week we found out they have decided on a complete uturn and now say we are a risk to the child, based on the way in which i have spoken to the social workers on the phone.
now we hear they are recommending the child be placed with his grand parents in torquay, 180 miles away from us, his school and freinds. the social workers have severely shit on us and have now resorted to lying about us.
talk about power crazed
we are in court on 6th april, we expect nothing from the judge who despises us simply because we fight tooth hammer and claw, plus we have accused him of being naiive and inadequate. which he is.
over the weekend the childs grandparent turned up at his foster placement unanounced and tried to tempt him to leave with him ... the grandparent lives in devon,,, he told the child he had been passing by on his way to swindon ( take a look at the route to swindon from torquay) and he thought he would pop in for a cup of tea. (loughborough).. very strange route, anyway the child refused to go. obviously this was a ploy to remove him from leicestershire, if he had gone he would not have come back that is for sure. well done to our lad for not falling for the bullshit being fed to him. this aint over we have only just started the real war!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)