Wednesday, 28 November 2012

good old ian josephs


FRIDAY 20 JULY 2012 UK

Revealed: the networks helping families flee social services

An exclusive investigation by Channel 4 News gains unprecedented access to underground networks which help families flee from social services in the UK.
The families say they are forced to flee because they will not get a fair hearing in the UK in thefamily courts. They turn to shadowy networks, often based online, and run by other parents, many of whom have already lost their children to the care system.
The scale and sophistication of the networks is extraordinary. We were told of safe houses across the UK where parents and their children could lie low before heading overseas, of fake birth certificates and of keys for rented homes in foreign countries that are exchanged in the middle of the night by strangers connected only by the networks.
As to the numbers involved it is impossible to verify, but we were told by one woman central to several groups that help parents get out of the country, that there has been "anything [from] 300 to 600 families in the past year that have left [the UK] from the involvement of social care".
The most popular destination is the Republic of Ireland, but the networks extend across Europe, Mediterranean countries being the other main destinations for families on the run.
From UK foster care to Cavan
We went to Cavan, a small town in the Republic of Ireland and one of the hubs for the network. There we met a mother who described a meticulously-planned snatch operation to steal her four-year-old son from foster care in the UK. At an organised contact session, she arranged an untraceable car, fake ID papers and even had a wig waiting in the car. "I knew I had to get him and get to the boat straight away. I knew that if I got caught, I would be done for kidnap," she says.
Her son had originally been put into voluntary care after she had a breakdown. She insists she got better but they refused to return him - leaving her, she says, with no choice but to run.
Having made it to Ireland she turned herself in to the authorities in the belief – shared by many in these networks – that she would get a fairer hearing from Irish social services. "They are not idiots over here but it's the way they act [and] work completely differently," she says. "They took him, completed the assessment and decided what was in my son's best interests."
For this mother that decision turned out to be that she could keep her son. Having been helped by the network herself, she in turn began to help others. This is how the networks regenerate themselves and grow.
Revealed: the networks helping families flee social services
'Punished for something that we hadn't done'
The charge levelled against the parents we spoke to was not physical or sexual abuse but emotional abuse or the risk of future emotional neglect or abuse. They say it is a charge that they cannot defend themselves against.
We met one British couple, Julie and Andy (not their real names), hiding out in a southern European country [pictured above]. The network helped them flee from the UK earlier this year when they discovered she was pregnant. They are now a couple in hiding.
Like many parents we met, their argument was that they were not given a fair hearing by a system that was too quick to remove children. Their child was removed at birth because the mother, who suffered pre-natal depression during her pregnancy, and the father, were assessed as posing a risk of future emotional neglect.
According to the couple, the local authority "just pressed the nuclear button". Talking about their daughter being placed in care they told Channel 4 News: "We hadn't hurt her. We were punished for something that we hadn't done."
While they accept the need for action in some cases they insist that parents can be accused of something that it is impossible to defend themselves against: "We recognise that that the child protection system is important but you can be convicted of the potentiality of causing harm or neglect."

They are now in hiding. "Once you've lost one you have no chance at all...after our experiences of our first child we have absolutely no confidence at all in the system."
News
Social services vs parents
Channel 4 News discovered an unlikely figure in an unlikely location, who is a central character in these networks. He has taken it upon himself to assist in the flight of many of these families. Sitting in Monaco, Ian Josephs [pictured left], an 80-year-old British businessman, puts it bluntly. "It's war," he says, "between parents who've had their children taken and the social workers who've taken them."
Having first come across what he sees as family courts' injustice some 30 years ago, he now helps hundreds of families each year as they fight the system to keep their children. "I get two or three new calls every single day practically," he says. "That doesn’t sound too many, but if you multiply it by 365 it comes to quite a lot."
But it is more than advice: "I'm no Bill Gates, but I do pay for pregnant women to escape the country."
He is motivated by an unshakeable belief that the system and the family courts have the wrong approach and that other countries will treat parents fighting charges of emotional neglect in an entirely different manner. "If you saw the women that I have seen whose babies have been snatched from them by truly heartless social workers who've shown no compassion, no sorrow, no pity, no words of consolation, you would think that somebody should do something about it," he says.
"Why is it happening so much in England and not in France, for example, where I live, or Monaco where I live, and not in Spain and not in Italy? It's a very British phenomena."
Who are the networks helping?
Mr Josephs and the other networks say they screen parents and do background checks into their histories before offering help. But how much can they really know about the parents and children they help flee the UK and the safeguards of the child protection system?
It all poses profound questions about who these networks are helping and whether they are not in fact putting some children in further danger. It is a view shared by Professor Corinne May-Chahal, the co-chair of the College of Social Work. "It is clearly saying that there is something very wrong with the system, if the only option people have is to run then there has to be something that needs to be looked at," she told Channel 4 News.
She adds that the potential risk to some of the children involved is of serious concern: "There are probably some very vulnerable children and how can we know they are getting the right help? It is really very worrying. If what's happening within the system is forcing parents or encouraging parents to leave then that could well be putting them in more danger."
And she says that this points to a wider issue in the system designed to protect children. "We all know the system has to change. And it’s not just social workers that need to improve - that is the key. Social work has to work within the system and it is the system that needs to change, not just one person or professional body within it."

More on this story

lol lol lol what a fucking joke. the task force is the likes of auntie diedre!!


Dear Deidre
THE WORLD'S FAVOURITE AGONY AUNT
Have you got a problem?
I'm here to help. With the help of my team of counsellors and sex therapists I reply individually to around 1,000 Sun readers a week, answering sexual, relationship, emotional and family problems for all ages. You can read my full problem page in The Sun newspaper everyday. If you have a problem you can emailproblems@deardeidre.org. Everyone receives a personal reply free of charge
Taskforce ... Deidre Sanders
Taskforce ... Deidre Sanders

How to make social work work

MOST of us believe there is a lot wrong with the social care system in this country, even social workers - perhaps especially social workers.

It’s in all our interests to help this profession get back on its feet.
Social workers don’t only have the job of protecting vulnerable children, they help vulnerable adults too – those with special needs, older people and the frail. All of us may need their help one day.
I am a member of the Social Work Taskforce – a mix of experts facing the tough job of coming up with the recipe for Government to put all this right - and I am asking you, Sun readers, for your experiences and views.
Then I can feed in your ideas so they have a chance to be turned into reality.
The more of you answer our special questionnaire, the better chance your views will be taken into account – and of course, I will welcome hearing from Sun-reading social workers too!
Deidre Sanders
Back to top of page


Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/deidre/2367473/How-can-we-make-social-work-work-Deidre-survey.html#ixzz2DYY8Rin5

Tuesday, 27 November 2012




a joke for you jan

message to the judges watching this blog:




because no one can cover up like you

teach the wife a lesson


Monday, 26 November 2012

THEY WIN AGAIN!!!

THE RCJ LORDS ARE COVERING UP HHJ TYZACKS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AGAINST US.  DRAFT ORDER RECIEVED IT MAY AS WELL HAVE JUST USED THE FOLLOWING WORDS:   YES YOU WERE WRONGED AND THE JUDGE ACTED UNLAWFULLY BUT BASICALLY WE NEED TO COVER TYZACKS ASS.  SO WE WILL HAVE TO REFUSE YOUR APPEAL ON THAT BASIS.


IT IS NOT THE END 


SOON ENOUGH   THEIR GOING TO BE :







you win again!!!

we have lost our appeal 



we could quite easily be angry and upset, but quite surprisingly we are not surprised at all.  the judgement is only at draft form so we can not share what it says.  Of course, for us the battle does not end there.  We will continue to fight because, simply put we have been wronged.  We now take some time to consider our options, one good thing about the judgement is a clear and transparent finding that HHJ Tyzack did indeed act in an unlawful manner.  as soon as we can legally put up the judgement we will let you guys see it.  though most of our subscribers (being the local authorities and the other parties in the case) will more than likely have seen the draft today too.


so you win again.       

but remember:     



Sunday, 25 November 2012

read this

http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/lawrefrom/vexatious_litigants/Submissions/VL13_-_Grant_Lester.pdf

A barrister becomes the judge of her client's sanity


A barrister becomes the judge of her client's sanity

A mother is told by her supposed legal representative that she is not 'mentally competent'

A mother and her daughter have been fighting a care order - Child protection system tears two more happy families apart
A mother finds herself in the Kafkaesque position of being told by her own lawyer that she is mad Photo: ALAMY
Imagine you are about to face an eight-day High Court hearing at which you will fight for what is easily the most important thing in your life. You are an intelligent woman, holding down a responsible job requiring extensive knowledge of the law – which you somehow manage to combine with devotedly looking after two small children.
Shortly before the hearing, you go to meet for the first time the barrister who has been chosen to represent you. You are astonished to be told that the barrister has spoken at length to the other side in the case and read through all their evidence, but not looked at your own, even though this factually corrects almost every point alleged against you. On this basis, without having met you, the barrister has diagnosed you as suffering from a psychological condition known as “querulous paranoia”, and says that you are not “mentally competent” to instruct her. She will therefore, in seeming contravention of the rule that barristers “must at all times protect and promote fearlessly” their “client’s best interests”, disregard anything you wish her to argue in court.
Having already represented yourself three times in front of judges, and won each time, you tell her that you do not wish to be represented by someone who proposes, in effect, to argue for the other side. At very short notice, you arrange to be examined by an eminent psychologist, with long experience as an expert court witness, who, after testing you for some hours, finds you to be entirely rational and competent. You lodge the correct papers with the court to say that you have “dis-instructed” your lawyers and wish to represent yourself.
The court staff agree with your lawyers that you cannot do this, even though you have found case law which states that where someone’s “mental capacity” has been called in to question, they must have the right to challenge this before a court “unfiltered by the discretion of public officials”.
In three years of reporting on the Kafkaesque world of our family courts, I have come across many extraordinary stories, but few more peculiar than this. The last time I wrote about the ordeal this mother has been subjected to by social workers for three years, it was to report on how, appearing for herself, she had persuaded a judge to lift a Prohibited Steps Order, imposed by another judge at the urging of social workers, which prohibited her from moving from her home, in a way which made it impossible for her to work. (Twice she lost highly paid jobs due to other bizarre demands made on her by the same social workers.) She was thus free to move with her children to be near another job, which pays her £350 a day.
The social workers where she now lives say they have no concerns over her competence as a mother and asked to take over her case. But the original social workers refused, continuing to impose demands with which she has, with difficulty, complied because she doesn’t want to give them any excuse to remove her children. Her solicitors, having agreed to a court hearing at the one time in a week when she had said she was unable to attend, wrongly informed the court that she planned to move to Scotland. The same lawyers then retained the barrister, from a chambers which specialises in representing local authorities, whom she is now told she has no right to “dis-instruct”, even though she had never instructed her in the first place. When this mother finally appears before the judge, it must be hoped he will give her every opportunity to put her side of this extraordinary story.